Hemodynamic changes during ophthalmic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ophthalmic procedures are mostly safe and minimally invasive with a low side effect profile; still, surgical manipulation anesthesia changes in ocular pressure, perioperative pain, anxiety, and the administration of drugs can cause measurable changes in both systemic and ocular hemodynamic responses. It is highly important to keep the cardiovascular and ocular perfusion stable as alterations in blood pressure, heart rate, intraocular pressure (IOP), and ocular blood flow may impact tissue perfusion and, in some cases, have a visual and systemic effect on patients [1,2]. The recent findings have demonstrated a growing trend to consider the relationship between systemic cardiovascular status and ocular vascular physiology in ophthalmic surgical and non-surgical environments.

Ocular circulation is highly susceptible to variations of perfusion pressure and vascular resistance. In several ophthalmic conditions, microvascular modifications have been reported; for instance, diabetic retinopathy - through which, one might say, altered blood flow parameters in the vessel can be used as an indicator that one is diabetic or not [1]. Same here, the study of changes of the microcirculation in the macular area due to retinal detachment repair have been carried out with optical coherence tomography angiography revealing that the ophthalmic interventions are quite often accompanied by major changes in the vascular properties of the retina [2]. Surgical procedures involving the extraocular muscles could change choroidal blood flow indicating perhaps that even the minimal ophthalmic disturbance can be the reason to detect the changes in ocular hemodynamics [3]. One should understand that these studies have provided evidence of the relationship between the manipulation of the eye and the changes in blood flow and hemodynamics in general.

Other than affecting the eye blood vessels, the ophthalmic procedures themselves are capable of initiating systemic changes in the cardiovascular system. Surgery related stress pain apprehension, use of anesthetics, and changes in the activity of body's automatic functions can, in fact, change the heart rate and blood pressure levels. Severe cardiovascular events during an ophthalmic operation are a rare occurrence. Really there were fatal cases shows that a good preoperative cardiovascular monitor and an assessment of risk factors are very necessary [4]. The selection of a and additional will, in some cases, change the dynamics of how blood pressure and other blood-related parameters respond. One such example is dexmedetomidine. it has being examined as a way of reducing an operation-induced increase in intraocular pressure, at the same time still, it also leads to certain cardiovascular alterations that a surgeon has to keep into consideration when doing anesthesia for an eye disease [5].

Stress before, during and after surgery may trigger more hemodynamic instability. Emotional states like anxiety and physical pain might lead the sympathetic nervous system to work harder, possibly causing tachycardia, increased blood pressure, and some other cardiovascular reactions. There have been studies on using binaural beats as a non-pharmaceutical method for controlling anxiety and pain that come at the time of surgery. This shows people are increasingly looking for alternatives that will not only improve patient comfort but perhaps also indirectly support physiological stability around surgery [6]. Besides that, drugs have been a mainstay of research. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs if given intraocularly, besides mainly ocular therapeutic effects, are suspected to have systemic cardiovascular effects and that means their whole heart-blood-vessel system is being questioned [7]. Clonidine but was tried for postoperative pain and vomiting in children after eye surgery where its side effects on the circulatory system could be considered as the main reason for overall evaluation of its usage in perioperative period [8].

Although quite many researchers have done their work on examining ocular blood flow IOP cardiovascular system, anesthetic effect and perioperative physiological changes; the pieces of evidence still are spread out in the different ophthalmic procedures and patient population. Up to now, systematic reviews have mainly reported on single outcomes or interventions, like retinal blood supply changes in eye, elevation or fluctuation in IOP, cardiovascular disturbances and perioperative symptom management [1-8]. Considering all that, a well-documented overview on hemodynamic changes that happen during eye operations is necessary.

As a result, this systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the accumulated evidence about hemodynamic changes happening during or after an ophthalmic procedure and highlight, besides the other relevant hemodynamic changes, heart rate, blood pressure, intraocular pressure, ocular blood flow variations. By merging data from several ophthalmic interventions, as well as pinpointing contributing factors for increased hemodynamical variation, we anticipate a better elucidation of the perioperative physiological reaction and better ways to achieve the safety of patients under general anesthesia, surgery, and monitoring practices in ophthalmology.

2.1 Study Design

   A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the hemodynamic changes that are happening and the ophthalmological procedures. This review was intended to bring together the existing literature about the responses of blood-related parameters and hemodynamic of the eye at systemic and local levels in the course or after ophthalmological interventions. The review method was carried out in line with the Preferred Research Item Statement: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance to produce an open, and a repeatable review of the literature.

2.2 Eligibility Criteria

   Studies deemed eligible by the group were those that documented changes in the hemodynamics of the systemic or the ocular of the patients who had some kind of eye surgery or were given perioperative interventions connected to eye surgery. The ones dealing with different eye-related surgical techniques, intravitreal interventions, ways of administering anesthesia, and other kinds of perioperative pharmaceutical or non-drug interventions were included too if the hemodynamic results of those studies were deemed appropriate by the researchers. The research articles that had no connection with any kind of eyes-related operation, did not measure any hemodynamic effect relevant to the eyes, did not provide enough outcome data, or were merely duplicates of other publications were left out. When more than one paper was based on the same study group, the researchers chose the paper that, in their opinion, contained more information and had more relevance.

2.3 Literature Search

   A major electronic search was done that included what comes next major databases: PubMed/MEDLINE Embase Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to find potentially relevant studies. The search strategy comprised combinations of keywords and related terms like ophthalmic surgery, ophthalmic procedures, hemodynamic changes, cardiovascular response, blood pressure, heart rate, intraocular pressure, ocular blood flow, retinal circulation, choroidal circulation, anesthesia, and perioperative changes. In addition, we hand-searched reference lists of those articles and previously published reviews that might have reported relevant studies which the electronic search has not picked up.

2.4 Study Selection

   First, all publications were checked for duplicates and duplicates were removed. Then, the titles and abstracts were reviewed to identify research studies that are presumably related to the review question. Only those articles were full-text examined that were assumed to be candidates for inclusion after the title and abstract analysis. Studies that met the eligibility requirements and offered sufficient detail about the eye operation and related hemodynamic results were included. The end decision on included or excluded articles depended on several factors: the study design and population intervention comparator, and how outcomes were presented.

2.5 Data Extraction

   Data from the studies were systematically extracted with the help of a predefined data-extraction system. The information on study characteristics, sample size, patient demographics, type of ophthalmic procedure, anesthesia or perioperative intervention, comparator group, duration of follow-up, methods of hemodynamic assessment were collected. Special emphasis was placed on changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, intraocular pressure, retinal or macular microcirculation, and choroidal blood flow. Whenever possible, baseline and post-procedure readings, changes from baseline, variance parameters, and inter-group differences were recorded for statistical analysis.

2.6 Outcome Measures

   The main effects observed after the review were systemic and ocular hemodynamic changes connected to ophthalmic procedures. The systemic hemodynamic changes referred to are increases in systolic, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate. Changes in intraocular pressure and the levels of retinal, macular, or choroidal blood flow and microcirculation were considered ocular outcomes. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular events that required medical attention around the time of surgery, complications arising from surgery, and the effect of anesthesia or other interventions on blood pressure stability.

2.7 Risk of Bias Assessment

   The methodological quality and risk of bias of the included studies were evaluated using suitable validated tools that are in line with the study design of each paper reviewed. Besides, the assessment took into account the possible limitations in selecting the participants, method in the studies, the ways outcomes were measured, confounding factors, absence of complete data, and selective reporting. The overall risk of bias was considered as part of the finalization of the results and drawing the conclusions of a meta-analysis.

2.8 Data Synthesis and Statistical Analysis

   The initial qualitative synthesis of results was done by the type of ophthalmic procedure, patient features, interventions given and hemodynamic outcomes. Where the studies were comparable for the populations, the interventions, the way of measuring outcomes and the general design of the study, an analysis was made on the numbers. For continuous outcomes, the results were expressed as either a mean difference or a standardized mean difference, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, based on the measurement scales used in the studies.

Differences in findings among studies were looked at using the I² statistic with the chi-square test. Given the variation expected in different ophthalmic operations, patients' features, different types of anesthetic methods, and techniques for measuring blood dynamics, we went with a random-effects model mainly to analyze the combination where appropriate. In those cases where the difference on the side of medical content or method was quite extensive so that it would not be meaningful to statistically combine or pool the results, they were simply reported through a narrative way. When there were enough published trials, we also thought of sensitivity, and sub-group analyses as possible ways of revealing sources of variability in the hemodynamic changes we observed.

    This review illustrates Really ophthalmic surgeries can sometimes lead to discernible changes in ocular and retrobulbar hemodynamics. Still, it remains difficult to make accurate generalizations about the extent, direction, and length of change across different types of procedures. Most consistently, strabismus surgery research has produced strabismus surgery results and, via color Doppler ultrasonography, researchers have been able to quantify blood-flow velocities and vascular resistance of the ophthalmic, central retinal, and posterior ciliary arteries. From a purely clinical point of view, retrobulbar circulation variations could be a major reason for eye perfusion change and might be a contributing factor explaining the higher incidence of ischemic complications in some groups of patients.

Early findings suggested that strabismus surgery does not necessarily lead to changes in the blood supply from ophthalmic arterv circulation that lasting. Bayramlar et al. who examined patients with surgery on two horizontal rectus muscles, discovered that at one week, one-month post-op follow-ups, there wasn't statistically significant differences in the ophthalmic artery's systolic, mean, and end-diastolic velocities, pulsatility index, and resistance index [9]. It is possible then that the vascular effects of usual horizontal rectus operations are only small or very short-lived. But, Gven et al. who looked more exactly at the blood flow differences in the blood vessels supplying the eye after single- and double-muscle surgery, reported a statistically significant change in blood flow parameters in the central retinal artery, posterior ciliary arteries, and ophthalmic artery [10]. Probably, the explanation for this contradiction lies in the differences in postoperative assessment intervals extent nature, and characteristics of the patients and anesthetic factors, and colour Doppler measurement techniques, between the studies.

The magnitude of muscles operated upon seems to have a major effect. Pelit and co-workers found changes in blood flow to the eye caused by ophthalmic artery flow soon after surgery. They noticed an increased end-diastolic and mean velocities, at the same time reduction of resistance and pulsatility indices were observed. These changes were most significant on the day of surgery and no longer statistically different seven days later, which probably indicates that the hemodynamic response is mainly a temporary thing [12]. Changes in this hemodynamic response over time suggest that surgical procedures, local inflammation, temporary effects due to the compression of the tissue, and autonomic reaction, among other things that are related to perioperative factors, temporarily change ocular vascular resistance instead of leading to a long-term damage of blood vessels.

Still, some studies have been conducted that do not show significant postoperative changes in blood vessels. For instance, Unsal et al. discovered that there were no considerable variations in Doppler parameters between patients under surgery for one and those for two horizontal rectus muscles, respectively. They also detected no noticeable differences before and after the ophthalmic, central retinal, or ciliary circulation [11]. So, their results should not be considered against other studies suggesting early vascular changes. Discrepancies in surgical approaches, employment of removable sutures, anesthetic handling, schedules of post- surgical evaluations, and limited number of subjects could have contributed to these contradictory results. The lack oof statistically significant changes in a small sample study should not lead one in the end that eye operation has no impact on the circulation.

New evidence confirms that post-strabismus surgery hemodynamic reactions of the retrobulbar blood vessels can be caused although the exact pattern depends on when and how the tests are done. Uzun et al. discovered that both single and double-rectus horizontal muscle surgeries led to changes in retrobulbar blood flow but that these vascular alterations failed to show a close link with choroidal thickness [14]. Interestingly at the same time that if patient discomfort is not addressed postoperative assessments conducted too close to surgery will be very difficult for example in a pediatric population. For this reason, it is quite possible that studies which have only followed up during later postoperative periods have missed the opportunity to detect transient hemodynamic reactions that have disappeared after they were recorded.

Cumulatively, the literature of strabismus indicates that a highly intricate and time- dependent mechanism is involved in the possibility of ophthalmic surgery altering retrobulbar blood flow. And, the type of change is not reliably pointing out that perfusion is reduced; in certain experiments, increased velocity of blood flow plus decreased vascular resistance was a result. In reality these discoveries could mean the arteries are reacting compensatory instead of the veins that are in trouble. Because of this, Doppler-based observations of changes in velocity or resistance should be analyzed with care because changes in these parameters are not equivalent to an increase or decrease of absolute tissue blood flow. Getting the difference right is mainly key when talking about wanting to link Doppler results with an ischemia clinically relevant level.

The medical value of these results appears the most when looking at the supply of the anterior segment of the eye on blood flow. Several rectus muscle surgeries theoretically could change the anterior ciliary circulation, and hemodynamic measurement retrobulbarly may so give an indication of vascular changes after surgical intervention. Present data indicates that colour Doppler ultrasonography may be a helpful non-invasive way of diagnosing vascular changes after surgery although interpretation is very limited by operator dependence and technical variability.

The surgical intervention in glaucoma patients offers another view on how intraocular pressure and ocular circulation interact. Trible et al. observed that a trabeculectomy resulted in long-term increases in average and end-diastolic velocities, and decreases in vascular resistance in the central retinal and short posterior arteries [15]. Such changes coincided with clinically feasible decreases in intraocular pressure, indicating that a pressure drop may be beneficial to ocular perfusion conditions. This observation suggests that ocular circulation is highly affected by intraocular pressure and is also influenced, but possibly in a different way, by the ocular perfusion pressure. But, changes of such velocity by Doppler alone cannot be relied on to reflect any change in overall blood supply, and because of these limitations of this measurement should be considered when judging the vascular benefits of pressure reduction treatment.

The results from this review so should be seen against the considerable differences between various types of eye operations. Strabismus surgery is mainly about playing with the external muscles responsible for eyeball movements, while trabeculectomy works by directly decreasing the eye pressure and draining the aqueous humour. Because of this, the hemodynamic changes are quite probably caused by different factors in these surgeries. The vascular reaction that was seen is probably influenced not only by surgical manipulations and inflammation but also by tissue pressures, fluctuations in the intraocular pressures, autonomic system activation, effects of the anesthetic, and postoperative pain all of which are quite different among the various procedures. This kind of variability may be the reason why there are no overall patterns of the changes in the flow of blood across different ophthalmic procedures.

A second major element to look into is when you perform hemodynamic assessment. It is known that vascular changes may have an early postoperative peak but they generally return to baseline after a few days [12]. Other works on post-operative later stages yet have reported long-term effects that are still present even after major eye pressure reduction surgeries [15]. That is why further research must rely on a regular and repetitive measurements from the first days after the operation up until the final visit instead of a one-time only post-operative checkup.

Variation in method is another main cause of differences in results. Majority of this work has used the technique of color Doppler ultrasonography that allows a number of blood flow characteristics to be measured viz peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, mean velocity, resistance index, and pulsatility index. While this method is non-invasive and helpful for examining retrobulbar circulation, the accuracy of the measurements may vary greatly depending upon the skill of the examiner, proper identification of the vessel, cooperation by the patient, positioning the probe, and general conditions of the body at time of examination. Limitations of Doppler evaluation as well as the challenge of getting immediate postoperative measurements have also been highlighted in recent studies. [14]. Adopting newer ways to capture images, for example, optical coherence tomography angiography might give insights on microvascular changes and help identify more characteristics of postoperative ocular perfusion besides what Doppler can reveal.

On the whole, the available data suggest that the hemodynamic changes following the ocular surgeries are real but of varying nature and often transitory. Strabismus surgery seems to be able to cause only minor modifications over a period of time as retrobulbar hemodynamic parameters are altered. Yet, various research findings are controversial about the exact amount and duration of these changes [9-14]. Trabeculectomy has yielded independent evidence in support that altering the intraocular pressure can cause improvements in the characteristics of reticular and posterior ciliary artery flows [15]. Together, these results strongly underline the necessity of the consideration of ocular perfusion as a major part of the perioperative ophthalmic care in patients who either have pre-existing vascular disease, glaucoma, or are highly prone to ischemic complications.

The chief drawback of the existing body of research is that many of the individual studies had quite limited samples. There is also a great diversity of surgical procedures, patient profiles, imaging methods, and the timing of postoperative follow-ups. These differences make it very hard to do direct comparison and may be responsible for the discrepancy in findings reported in different published papers. What we need are bigger studies carried out prospectively where common standards for Doppler or multimodal imaging will be used, postoperative assessments carried out at the same intervals as the research protocol dictated, and clinically significant perfusion outcomes measured. This sort of investigation will allow the medical community to assess whether what imaging techniques have picked up is really the manifestation of changes in the eye's blood supply that clinicians can relate to or whether the close following-up during and after surgery or the giving of certain therapies will be able to mitigate the development of ischemia-related complications to at least some extent.

   Cataract and glaucoma surgeries have both been linked to transient changes in blood flow to and within the eye as well as changes in general blood flow to the body but the extent these effects go and how long they last largely depends on the type of surgery, surgical extent, anesthesia and the various perioperative factors. There is a body of evidence suggesting that a strabismus surgical intervention may bring about temporary modifications in the eye-related and retrobulbar blood-flow parameters, with several studies having pointed out that these modifications can be most significant during the initial postoperative period and later gradually return to the preoperative levels. In line with evidence from trabeculectomy there seems to be a trend that lowering intraocular pressure by itself can result in beneficial changes in retinal and posterior ciliary arterial flow characteristics. The overall results of the studies show that changes in hemodynamics after surgery do not always mean a pathological vascular compromise, and they might even in some situations reflect short-time or compensatory vascular responses. Still, differences among studies, variations in Doppler imaging methods, limited sample sizes, and irregularities in the timing of postoperative assessments hinder the drawing of any firm conclusions about their clinical relevance. That's why, a cautious understanding of ocular blood-flow indices seems necessary mainly when it comes to patients suffering from ocular vascular or cardiovascular risk factors before surgery. Future studies involving larger prospective groups with standardized protocols and measuring techniques of systemic and ocular hemodynamics should be carried out at specified intervals before and after surgery. The combination of colour Doppler ultrasound imaging and other modern vascular imaging modalities could help to deliver the complete picture of ocular perfusion. An improved knowledge of these hemodynamic responses may over time help to enhance perioperative monitoring, risk stratification, and individualized management so that ophthalmic surgery itself becomes safer.

1.       Hanafi M, Ardyanto TD, Soewondo W, Pamungkasari EP, Muthmainah, Putranto W, Indrakila S. Vascular dynamics in diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ophthalmic Doppler indices in diabetic and non-diabetic populations. Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research. 2026 Aug;23(4):14791641261476327.

2.       Chen X, Li W, Jin X, Zhang Y, Li R, Liu T. Macular microcirculation changes after repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment assessed with optical coherence tomography angiography: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Physiology. 2022 Dec 14;13:995353.

3.       Khazaei S, Moravej Z, Motamed Shariati M. Effects of strabismus surgery on choroidal blood flow: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Retina and Vitreous. 2026 Feb 23;12(1):52.

4.       Ferrara M, Romano V, Longo L, Rovati M, Raimondi R, Semeraro F, Aliberti S, Romano MR. Life-threatening complications in ophthalmic surgery: a systematic review. Eye. 2025 Jan;39(1):69-78.

5.       Chang CY, Chen HA, Chien YJ, Wu MY. Attenuation of the increase in intraocular pressure with dexmedetomidine: Systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2021 Feb 1;68:110065.

6.       Xiong J, Jiang X, Cai B, Zhao L, Zhang Q, Luo J. Binaural beats for perioperative anxiety and pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complementary therapies in medicine. 2025 Oct 30:103299.

7.       Thulliez M, Angoulvant D, Le Lez ML, Jonville-Bera AP, Pisella PJ, Gueyffier F, Bejan-Angoulvant T. Cardiovascular events and bleeding risk associated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibodies: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA ophthalmology. 2014 Nov 1;132(11):1317-26.

8.       Hsu YP, Chu KC, Bai CH, Huang CJ, Chen C, Hsu CW. Safety and efficacy of clonidine on postoperative vomiting and pain in pediatric ophthalmic surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Pediatric Anesthesia. 2019 Oct;29(10):1011-23.

9.       Bayramlar H, Totan Y, Cekiç O, Yazicioglu KM, Aydin E. Evaluation of hemodynamic changes in the ophthalmic artery with color Doppler ultrasonography after strabismus surgery. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2000 Mar-Apr;37(2):94-100. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-20000301-08. PMID: 10779267.

10.    Güven DM, Ziraman IM, Tomaç SM, Sancak DM, Karademir AM, Hasiripi H. Hemodynamic changes after strabismus surgery. Strabismus. 2000 Mar;8(1):21-7. PMID: 10855052.

11.    Akyüz Unsal AI, Unsal A, Ozkan SB, Karaman CZ. The effect of strabismus surgery on retrobulbar hemodynamics. J AAPOS. 2007 Jun;11(3):277-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2006.12.059. Epub 2007 Apr 16. PMID: 17434775.

12.    Pelit A, Barutçu O, Oto S, Aydin P. Investigation of hemodynamic changes after strabismus surgery using color Doppler imaging. J AAPOS. 2002 Aug;6(4):224-7. doi: 10.1067/mpa.2002.124901. PMID: 12185347.

13.    Lee NH, Lee SN. Investigation of hemodynamic changes in the ophthalmic artery using color Doppler imaging after strabismus surgery. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep;19(3):208-12. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2005.19.3.208. PMID: 16209283.

14.    Uzun A, Altas H, Sahin AK. Investigation of alterations in retrobulbar hemodynamics and their correlation with choroidal thickness after strabismus surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 27;24(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03363-3. PMID: 38413884; PMCID: PMC10898150.

15.    Trible JR, Sergott RC, Spaeth GL, Wilson RP, Katz LJ, Moster MR, Schmidt CM. Trabeculectomy is associated with retrobulbar hemodynamic changes. A color Doppler analysis. Ophthalmology. 1994 Feb;101(2):340-51. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(13)31332-3. PMID: 8115155.