Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli in Drinking Water Samples from Urban and Rural Areas.

Authors:
  • Hitendra Dev Ramteke , Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Shri Rawatputra Sarkar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Raipur, CG, India.
  • Ayesha Chauhan , Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Shri Rawatputra Sarkar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Raipur, CG, India.

Article Information:

Published:August 27, 2025
Article Type:Original Research
Pages:49 - 51
Received:July 28, 2025
Accepted:August 18, 2025

Abstract:

Background: Drinking water contamination by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria has become a major public health concern worldwide. Escherichia coli is commonly used as an indicator organism for fecal contamination and antimicrobial resistance in water sources. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of MDR E. coli in drinking water samples collected from urban and rural areas. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using 120 drinking water samples collected from urban and rural regions. Samples were processed using standard microbiological techniques for isolation and identification of E. coli. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method according to CLSI guidelines. MDR strains were defined as isolates resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics. Results: Out of 120 water samples, 42 (35%) were positive for E. coli. Higher contamination was observed in rural areas (45%) compared to urban areas (25%). Among the 42 isolates, 26 (61.9%) were identified as MDR. Resistance was highest against ampicillin (76.2%), cefotaxime (64.3%), and ciprofloxacin (52.4%), while lower resistance was observed against amikacin (9.5%) and imipenem (4.8%). Rural isolates showed significantly higher MDR prevalence compared to urban isolates. Conclusion: The study demonstrated a considerable prevalence of MDR E. coli in drinking water, particularly in rural areas. Continuous monitoring of water quality and implementation of effective sanitation and antibiotic stewardship programs are urgently needed to prevent the spread of antimicrobial resistance through water sources.

Keywords:

Escherichia coli multidrug resistance drinking water antimicrobial resistance urban water rural water

Article :

Introduction:

Safe drinking water is essential for human health and well-being. Contamination of water supplies with pathogenic microorganisms remains a significant public health challenge, particularly in developing countries. Among microbial contaminants, Escherichia coli is considered an important indicator organism for fecal pollution and poor sanitary conditions. The presence of E. coli in drinking water suggests contamination by human or animal waste and indicates the possible presence of enteric pathogens.

 

In recent years, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a global health threat. The widespread and irrational use of antibiotics in humans, animals, and agriculture has accelerated the development of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Water systems have become major reservoirs for resistant organisms and resistance genes. MDR E. coli strains in drinking water may transfer resistance genes to other pathogenic bacteria, increasing the burden of difficult-to-treat infections.

 

Urban and rural populations differ considerably in terms of sanitation, water treatment, infrastructure, and awareness regarding hygiene. Rural communities often rely on borewells, hand pumps, ponds, or untreated groundwater, which may increase the risk of microbial contamination. Urban water systems, although treated, may still become contaminated through damaged pipelines or poor storage practices.

 

The present study was conducted to assess the prevalence of MDR E. coli in drinking water samples collected from urban and rural areas and to evaluate their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns

Materials and Methods:

Study Design and Area

A cross-sectional laboratory-based study was conducted over a period of six months. Drinking water samples were collected from urban and rural areas of the study region.

 

Sample Collection

A total of 120 drinking water samples were collected, including:

          60 samples from urban areas

          60 samples from rural areas

Samples were collected aseptically in sterile bottles from different sources such as:

                      Municipal taps

                      Hand pumps

                      Borewells

                      Household storage containers

                      Samples were transported immediately to the microbiology laboratory under cold conditions for analysis.

 

Isolation and Identification of E. coli

Water samples were cultured using standard bacteriological procedures. Samples were inoculated onto MacConkey agar and Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB) agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours.

Typical lactose-fermenting colonies showing metallic sheen on EMB agar were subjected to biochemical tests including:

                      Indole test

                      Methyl red test

                      Voges–Proskauer test

                      Citrate utilization test

Confirmed isolates were identified as E. coli.

 

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar according to CLSI guidelines.

The antibiotics tested included:

       Ampicillin

       Ciprofloxacin

       Cefotaxime

       Gentamicin

       Tetracycline

       Imipenem

       Amikacin

       Chloramphenicol

Zones of inhibition were measured and interpreted as sensitive, intermediate, or resistant.

 

Definition of MDR

Isolates resistant to at least three different classes of antibiotics were considered multidrug resistant.

 

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using percentage and chi-square test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

Prevalence of E. coli

Out of 120 drinking water samples, 42 (35%) showed positive growth for E. coli.

 

Area

Total Samples

Positive Samples

Percentage

Urban

60

15

25%

Rural

60

27

45%

Total

120

42

35%

 

Higher contamination was observed in rural areas.

 

Antibiotic Resistance Pattern

Antibiotic

Resistant Isolates (%)

Ampicillin

76.2%

Cefotaxime

64.3%

Ciprofloxacin

52.4%

Tetracycline

47.6%

Chloramphenicol

38.1%

Gentamicin

21.4%

Amikacin

9.5%

Imipenem

4.8%

 

Prevalence of MDR E. coli

Area

MDR Isolates

Percentage

Urban

7/15

46.7%

Rural

19/27

70.4%

Total

26/42

61.9%

Rural water samples demonstrated significantly higher MDR prevalence.

Discussion:

The present study revealed substantial contamination of drinking water with E. coli, particularly in rural areas. Similar findings have been reported in previous studies from different parts of India where inadequate sanitation and improper waste disposal contributed to water contamination.

 

The higher prevalence of MDR isolates observed in rural water sources may be associated with indiscriminate antibiotic usage, poor sewage management, and contamination from agricultural runoff. Ampicillin and cefotaxime resistance were notably high, suggesting widespread beta-lactam resistance among environmental isolates.

 

The emergence of MDR E. coli in drinking water poses a serious health risk because these organisms may cause gastrointestinal infections, urinary tract infections, and systemic diseases. Moreover, environmental dissemination of resistant bacteria contributes to the spread of AMR within communities.

 

The comparatively lower resistance against imipenem and amikacin indicates that these antibiotics remain effective against many isolates. However, the detection of carbapenem resistance, even at low levels, is alarming and requires immediate surveillance.

Regular monitoring of drinking water quality, improvement in sanitation infrastructure, and rational antibiotic use are essential measures to control the spread of resistant bacteria.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrated a significant prevalence of MDR E. coli in drinking water samples collected from urban and rural areas. Rural regions showed higher contamination and resistance rates compared to urban areas. The findings emphasize the urgent need for proper water treatment, sanitation practices, and antimicrobial resistance surveillance to safeguard public health.

References:

1.        World Health Organization. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. 4th ed. Geneva: WHO; 2017.

2.        CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 32nd ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2022.

3.        Jha RK, Khandait M, Sardar M, Sharma M, Choudhary RK, Rashid G. Prevalence of multidrug-resistant and ESBL producing Escherichia coli in household drinking water from rural areas of Gurugram, Haryana. J Chem Health Risks. 2024;14(5):1086-97.

4.        Shekhar C, Joshi N, Singh A. Prevalence of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in drinking-water in and around Ayodhya, India. Indian J Vet Sci Biotechnol. 2021;19(1):26-30.

5.        Kaushik M, Khare N, Kumar S, Gulati P. High prevalence of antibiotic resistance and integrons in Escherichia coli isolated from urban river water, India. Microb Drug Resist. 2019;25(3):359-70.

6.        Seguni NZ, Kimera ZI, Msafiri F, Mgaya FX, Joachim A, Mwingwa A, et al. Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from hospital sewage. Bull Natl Res Cent. 2023;47:66.

7.        Cabral JP. Water microbiology. Bacterial pathogens and water. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7(10):3657-703.

8.        Ashbolt NJ. Microbial contamination of drinking water and disease outcomes in developing regions. Toxicology. 2004;198(1-3):229-38.

9.        Ahmed W, Neller R, Katouli M. Host species-specific metabolic fingerprint database for Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(8):4461-8.

10.     Wellington EM, Boxall AB, Cross P, Feil EJ, Gaze WH, Hawkey PM, et al. The role of environment in the emergence of antibiotic resistance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(2):155-65.

11.     Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(2):123-40.

12.     Levy SB, Marshall B. Antibacterial resistance worldwide. Nat Med. 2004;10:S122-9.

13.     Allen HK, Donato J, Wang HH, Cloud-Hansen KA, Davies J, Handelsman J. Call of the wild: antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(4):251-9.

14.     WHO. Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance. Geneva: WHO; 2014.

15.     Pruden A, Pei R, Storteboom H, Carlson KH. Antibiotic resistance genes as emerging contaminants. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40(23):7445-50.

16.     Baquero F, Martínez JL, Cantón R. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in water environments. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008;19(3):260-5.

17.     Berendonk TU, Manaia CM, Merlin C, Fatta-Kassinos D, Cytryn E, Walsh F, et al. Tackling antibiotic resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(5):310-7.

18.     Pitout JD. Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(6):544-51.

19.     Kumarasamy KK, Toleman MA, Walsh TR, Bagaria J, Butt F, Balakrishnan R, et al. Emergence of antibiotic resistance in India. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(9):597-602.

20.     Davies J, Davies D. Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;74(3):417-33.

21.     Manaia CM. Assessing the risk of antibiotic resistance transmission from environment to humans. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2432.

22.     Finley RL, Collignon P, Larsson DG, McEwen SA, Li XZ, Gaze WH, et al. The scourge of antibiotic resistance. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(5):704-10.