Clinico-Epidemiological Profile and Visual Outcome of Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy in a Tertiary Eye Care Center
- Nameet Nande , Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Krishna Mohan Medical College, Mathura, India.
- Neha Aditya Kanhere , Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Saraswati Institute of Medical Sciences, Harpur, India.
- Ajit Kumar Shadani , Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Shri Balaji Institute of Medical Science, Raipur, India.
Article Information:
Abstract:
Background: Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of preventable blindness among working-age adults worldwide. With the increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus, the burden of DR is rising significantly, particularly in developing countries. Early detection and timely management are essential to prevent visual impairment and blindness. Studies from tertiary eye care centers have reported substantial visual morbidity associated with advanced stages of DR. Aim: To evaluate the clinico-epidemiological profile and visual outcomes of patients diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy attending a tertiary eye care center. Materials and Methods: A hospital-based prospective observational study was conducted among 150 patients diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy attending the Ophthalmology Department of a tertiary eye care center over one year. Demographic characteristics, duration of diabetes, systemic risk factors, clinical grading of DR, and visual acuity outcomes were recorded. Visual outcome was assessed after appropriate medical or surgical management. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Among 150 patients, the majority belonged to the age group of 51–70 years (64%). Males constituted 62% of cases. Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR) was observed in 66% of patients, while Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) was noted in 34%. Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) was present in 38% of patients. Significant associations were found between severity of DR and duration of diabetes, poor glycemic control, hypertension, and dyslipidemia (p<0.05). Improvement in visual acuity following treatment was observed in 61.3% of patients. Conclusion: Diabetic retinopathy predominantly affects middle-aged and elderly diabetic individuals and is strongly associated with longer duration of diabetes and systemic comorbidities. Early diagnosis and timely intervention significantly improve visual outcomes and reduce the risk of blindness.
Keywords:
Article :
Introduction:
Diabetes mellitus has emerged as a major public health challenge globally. One of the most significant microvascular complications of diabetes is diabetic retinopathy (DR), which remains a leading cause of visual impairment and blindness among adults. Chronic hyperglycemia causes progressive retinal microvascular damage leading to retinal ischemia, vascular leakage, neovascularization, and vision-threatening complications. According to recent epidemiological studies, diabetic retinopathy affects approximately one-third of diabetic individuals, with vision-threatening retinopathy affecting nearly one-tenth of patients.
The risk of DR increases with longer duration of diabetes, poor glycemic control, hypertension, nephropathy, and dyslipidemia. Visual loss in DR occurs mainly due to diabetic macular edema, vitreous hemorrhage, tractional retinal detachment, and neovascular glaucoma. Tertiary eye care centers frequently manage advanced stages of DR requiring laser photocoagulation, intravitreal injections, and vitreoretinal surgery. Evaluation of clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes is important for planning preventive strategies and improving patient care.
Therefore, the present study was undertaken to assess the clinico-epidemiological profile and visual outcomes of patients with diabetic retinopathy attending a tertiary eye care center.
Objectives
1. To study the demographic profile of patients with diabetic retinopathy.
2. To evaluate the clinical characteristics and severity of diabetic retinopathy.
3. To identify associated systemic risk factors.
4. To assess visual outcomes following treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Study Design
Prospective observational study.
Study Setting
Department of Ophthalmology, Tertiary Eye Care Teaching Hospital.
Study Duration
12 months.
Sample Size
150 patients diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy.
Inclusion Criteria
• Patients aged ≥18 years.
• Diagnosed cases of Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
• Presence of diabetic retinopathy on fundus examination.
• Willingness to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
• Retinal vascular diseases other than DR.
• Ocular trauma.
• Advanced cataract preventing fundus visualization.
• Patients lost to follow-up.
Data Collection
Detailed clinical evaluation included:
• Age
• Gender
• Duration of diabetes
• HbA1c levels
• Hypertension status
• Dyslipidemia
• Smoking history
• Visual acuity assessment
Fundus examination was performed using indirect ophthalmoscopy and slit-lamp biomicroscopy with a 90D lens.
Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy
• Mild NPDR
• Moderate NPDR
• Severe NPDR
• PDR
Treatment Modalities
• Observation
• Laser photocoagulation
• Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections
• Vitrectomy
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0.
• Chi-square test
• Independent t-test
• Logistic regression analysis
p<0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results:
Table 1: Age Distribution
|
Age Group (Years) |
Number (%) |
|
31–40 |
12 (8%) |
|
41–50 |
30 (20%) |
|
51–60 |
48 (32%) |
|
61–70 |
48 (32%) |
|
>70 |
12 (8%) |
Mean age = 58.4 ± 9.8 years.
Table 2: Gender Distribution
|
Gender |
Number (%) |
|
Male |
93 (62%) |
|
Female |
57 (38%) |
Table 3: Duration of Diabetes
|
Duration |
Number (%) |
|
<5 years |
24 (16%) |
|
5–10 years |
48 (32%) |
|
11–15 years |
42 (28%) |
|
>15 years |
36 (24%) |
Table 4: Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy
|
Stage |
Number (%) |
|
Mild NPDR |
30 (20%) |
|
Moderate NPDR |
42 (28%) |
|
Severe NPDR |
27 (18%) |
|
PDR |
51 (34%) |
Table 5: Associated Risk Factors
|
Risk Factor |
Number (%) |
|
Hypertension |
84 (56%) |
|
Dyslipidemia |
63 (42%) |
|
Smoking |
36 (24%) |
|
HbA1c >8% |
96 (64%) |
Table 6: Diabetic Macular Edema
|
Status |
Number (%) |
|
Present |
57 (38%) |
|
Absent |
93 (62%) |
Table 7: Visual Outcome After Treatment
|
Visual Outcome |
Number (%) |
|
Improved |
92 (61.3%) |
|
Stable |
40 (26.7%) |
|
Deteriorated |
18 (12.0%) |
Discussion:
The present study demonstrated that diabetic retinopathy predominantly affected individuals aged above 50 years, with a male predominance. Similar observations were reported in hospital-based studies from South Asia and India.
Most patients had NPDR (66%), while PDR accounted for 34% of cases. Comparable findings have been documented in tertiary care studies evaluating diabetic eye disease.
Duration of diabetes was strongly associated with DR severity. Patients with diabetes duration exceeding 10 years showed significantly greater prevalence of severe NPDR and PDR. Poor glycemic control reflected by elevated HbA1c was another important predictor.
Hypertension and dyslipidemia were common coexisting conditions and were significantly associated with advanced retinopathy. Similar associations have been reported in large epidemiological studies.
Diabetic macular edema was present in 38% of patients and represented an important cause of visual impairment. Following treatment, visual improvement was observed in over 60% of patients, emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis and timely management.
The findings support the growing evidence that regular retinal screening and multidisciplinary diabetic care are essential to reduce vision-threatening complications.
Conclusion:
Diabetic retinopathy remains a major cause of visual morbidity among diabetic patients attending tertiary eye care centers. Longer duration of diabetes, poor glycemic control, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were significant risk factors associated with severe disease.
Early screening, patient education, metabolic control, and timely ophthalmic intervention can significantly improve visual outcomes and reduce blindness due to diabetic retinopathy.
Limitations
1. Single-center study.
2. Limited sample size.
3. Short follow-up duration.
4. Hospital-based design limiting generalizability.
Recommendations
• Annual retinal screening for all diabetic patients.
• Strict glycemic and blood pressure control.
• Public awareness regarding diabetic eye disease.
• Strengthening retinal services at peripheral healthcare centers.
References:
1. Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(4):520-526.
2. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(5):786-806.
3. Yau JWY, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, et al. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(3):556-564.
4. Cheung N, Mitchell P, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy. Lancet. 2010;376(9735):124-136.
5. Wong TY, Sun J, Kawasaki R, et al. Guidelines on diabetic eye care. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(10):1608-1622.
6. Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(7):987-992.
7. Gupta V, Gupta A, Dogra MR. Diabetic retinopathy in India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019;67(4):451-457.
8. Das AV, Prashanthi GS, Basu S. Clinical profile and magnitude of diabetic retinopathy: EMR-driven big data analytics from India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69(11):3110-3117.
9. Pandey A, Lamichhane G, Khanal R, et al. Assessment of visual morbidity amongst diabetic retinopathy at tertiary eye care center. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17:263.
10. Jayalekshmi T, Poulose KP. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in patients in a tertiary hospital in South India. Int J Med Res Rev. 2016;4(10):1798-1804.
11. Phirke S, Metange S, Gurudasani B. Clinicoepidemiological study of diabetic retinopathy in a tertiary care center. Int J Sci Res. 2023;12(4):606-608.
12. Aiello LP, Gardner TW, King GL, et al. Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(1):143-156.
13. Antonetti DA, Klein R, Gardner TW. Mechanisms of diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(13):1227-1239.
14. Congdon NG, Friedman DS, Lietman T. Important causes of visual impairment worldwide. JAMA. 2003;290(15):2057-2060.
15. Wilkinson CP, Ferris FL, Klein RE, et al. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy severity scales. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(9):1677-1682.
16. Sivaprasad S, Gupta B, Crosby-Nwaobi R, Evans J. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis. 2012;12(4):180-185.
17. Orji A, Rani PK, Narayanan R, et al. Economic burden of diabetic retinopathy care in South India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69(3):666-670.
18. Raman R, Ganesan S, Pal SS, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in India. Sankara Nethralaya Study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(2):311-318.
19. Klein BEK. Overview of epidemiologic studies of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007;14(4):179-183.
20. Ting DSW, Cheung GCM, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy: global prevalence and prevention. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12(10):567-579.
21. Romero-Aroca P. Managing diabetic macular edema. World J Diabetes. 2011;2(6):98-104.
22. Fong DS, Aiello LP, Ferris FL, Klein R. Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(10):2540-2553.